What motivates us to work? Contrary to conventional wisdom, it isn’t just money. But it’s not exactly joy either. It seems that most of us thrive by making constant …
Nguồn: https://truthabouttoyota.com/
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://truthabouttoyota.com/category/moi-truong
1365
"by getting people to work harder, you get them to enjoy what they're doing to a higer degree"
If you want people to build many more toys for less to no compensation, instead of taking the toy apart at the end, have them hand it to a child.
Actually making something someone else is going to use, actually providing a service someone needs or wants, is a huge factor in how fulfilling a job is. So many of our businesses don't actually add any real value to anyone's life, and that's more depressing than anything. I was a lot more proud of my work when I made tombstones than selling software that people can use to sell software to other people who want to sell software, even though I'm making twice as much money.
people dont need money as motivation. money habs existed for about 2000 years so its a new invention. we have been working hard without it for 100s of thousands of years without it. we have made great things in the last few thousands because by traveling more (and conquering, sadly) we started to speak the same languages. the teamwork that we are capable of now is better so tech got better. money doesnt mean anything. we need it to survive in this world order but as anyone who has ever studies anthropology will tell you there are an infinite amount of ways of organizing the world this is just one
15:30 parents feel the same way
Estoy aquí por Proyecto G 😀 Que genial presentación
17:37 me next to the hairless guy
Ok cool
I am confused what does he mean cause I can't relate and now I am more sad
Wow, its beautiful explained between Efficiency and Meaning ..Great examples..
I liked this video until he starting pushing marxist theory… get outta here with that, lol.
I always enjoy the talk of Dan…as he gives the real fact with experimental examples, that is the more iconic one to relate all this.. vary clearly.
I read some of his books and papers including the book "Payoff" which speaks about everything that this speech is about, but I am so impressed, I could relisten/read it again and again. One impressive field this behavioral economics is.
This is TED
Employer: Did you will build Bionicle for 0,20 $ – tax
Worker: Even less TED teach me i should work for idea
I read this guy's book it was great
That graph does not look authentic to me
I'm Watching this as a feature of my college assigment.I loved this sentence from Dan "By getting individuals to work more earnestly, you really got them to adore what they're doing into a higher degree". Extraordinary video and provocative thoughts on "signifying" "proficiency" "ability".
Indeed, this practically covers the manufacturing plant working knowledge however no uncertainty it reaches out to each workplace.And you know, Ariely just tended to a solitary case made by Marx. He didn't guarantee that everything Marx said is correct or that Communism is the best approach. Because Carl Marx said it doesn't mean it definitely prompts Communism.
Loved the origami test. Working more enthusiastically on something increasingly confused and completing it effectively ingrains sentiments of pride, achievement and connection. To those disengaged, it's basically not intriguing.
Finally,this video really resonates with how I feel in college right now… I would try harder if I felt that there was more continuity to my school work.
it's time for soviet union again
LEGO, no "s" ever, or I'll have to rewrite my childhood
Great…more research on how to squeeze more production out of workers for less…
Some great ideas here. I appreciated everything up till the Adam Smith, Karl Marx discussion. I’d like to unpack that a little. So your argument that Marx is more relevant in the Information Age is troublesome because if everyone had their way, we’d all be our own director and very little would get get accomplished because there would be no hierarchy, therefore no organization. This of course is not sustainable because humans are social beings, being around and collaborating with others creates meaning (as you point out) so this is not sustainable, and leads to chaos, and of course we know what atrocities that’s turned into throughout human history. On the other side of it, Adam Smith does seem to be too rigid for today’s economic challenges. So how about John Nash & Game Theory? Doing what’s best for the individual and the group (or hierarchy if you prefer) seems to be the way most organizations today naturally solve this problem. It could be that taking appropriate steps to acknowledge individual & team accomplishments within the organization is good both for individuals/team and the whole. I think that’s a better model to discuss, and much more solid ground to stand on.
what makes the 50 year old minimum wage retail worker (who checks YOU out behind a counter and then does it another 800 times in a single 6 hour shift) FEEL GOOD about their work?
nice chanel
Culture is not a science. As people are not metric.
With the right culture in a workplace anything is possible.
It will promote your people to govern themselves as if there are no rules. It will encourage them to all pull in the same direction even though their opinions may differ. It will create a workplace that promotes supporting each other as a community to take ownership of the brand they’ve come to represent as work.
The power of workplace culture is exponential when right and destructive when not.
So how do leaders ensure their company culture is right and unified across departments with different styles of leadership? How do they ensure a unified brand culture thrives across multiple offices in locations where native cultures may vary, or simply in the same office where people, being human will all be different.
Great leaders embrace the differences of their people with a unified culture that empowers them to thrive, their way, guided and encouraged by the values of a brand.
Sounds easy, then why are so many people not thriving at work?
Welcome to the reason why CULTCHA was born by three very different minds with a unified mission to improve the working lives of employees worldwide for the better.
Was he talking about amazon/Microsoft
Maybe when I am financially secure, I could focus more on the meaning of my job. But somehow meaning and compensation are connected.
Muito bom!
Very good info. Thanks a lot.
Cool
Prof Ariely is one of the best psychology researchers in my opinion. He is just so awesome and his research so practical and insightful!
B i o n i c l e
Consider what the Bible teaches about work at https://youtu.be/39NTnlnGbBg
This TED audience has no sense of humour.